Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Kumar

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2004No. 45A03-0203-CV-94, 45A03-0302-CV-54PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Thomas Schaefer appeals a summary judgment for Atul Kumar on Schaefer's complaint to set aside Kumar's tax deed for a parcel of real estate ("the property") located in Lake County. 1 Schaefer raises one issue on appeal, which we expand and restate as: 1) whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Kumar on the basis that Schaefer's complaint was barred by a one-year statute of limitation, and 2) whether the grant of summary judgment in favor of Kumar can be affirmed based upon any other theory supported by the designated materials.

We affirm. 2

FACTS…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Young v. ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. John Shewchun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. County Line Towing, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Tax Certificate Investments, Inc. v. SmethersIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Diversified Investments, LLC v. U.S. Bank, NAIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. B P Amoco Corp. v. SzymanskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Edwards v. NeaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Booker T. Prince, Jr. v. Marion County Auditor and Marion County TreasurerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Badawi v. OrthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API