Legal Opinion
B P Amoco Corp. v. Szymanski
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 2004No. 45A05-0307-CV-363PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Plaintiff, B.P. Amoco Corporation (Amoco), appeals the trial court's Orders in favor of Appellees-Defendants, Robert Szymanski (Szymanski) and the Lake County Board of Commissioners (Commissioners), with regard to Amoco's Complaint to Set Aside Deed and to Quiet Title.
We reverse and remand with instructions. 1
ISSUE
Amoco raises three issues in this consolidated appeal, one of which we find disposi-tive: whether the trial court erred in finding it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under Ind. Trial Rule 12(B)(1) to hear Amoco's contest of a tax…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schaefer v. KumarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Ball Stores, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Hall v. KincaidIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Albright v. PyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Kessen v. GraftIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Diversified Investments, LLC v. U.S. Bank, NAIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Edwards v. NeaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- U.S. Bank v. AmirOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- St. Mary's Medical Center, Inc. v. McCarthyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re 2005 Tax Sale Parcel No. 24006-001-0022-01Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.