Legal Opinion

MILLTOWN-FORD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 12, 2024No. 3:19-cv-21494Unknown

1Opinion

UNITESDT ATEDSI STRICCOTU RT DISTRIOCFNT E WJ ERSEY THEM ILLTOWN-FAOVREDN UE REDEVELOPAMGEENNTC Y, Plaintiff, CivAcitli Noo1n.9 -21(R4K)9( 4R LS) v. MEMORANDUM ORDER SBB UILDINGA SSOCIALT.EPeS.at,,l ., Defendants. KIRSCDHi,s tJruidcgte THIMSA TTEcRo mbeesfo trheCe o uurptot nhp ea rtCireoss's -MIonLt iimoitnnFosie x thDea toefV aluaotfti hSoeun b jPercotp ientr htceyo ndemancattbiieoofonntr heCe o uTrhte. troinat lha em ouonfjt u csotm penfosrat thtieao knoi ftn hgPe r opiessre tttyob egoinMn a y2 9, 202(4E.CN Fo 1.8 0O.nM) a r8c2,h0 24, MPillalitnotwiAnffv- eFnRoueredd e velAogpemnecnyt…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sweet v. RechelSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. State v. SilverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CaoiliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Housing Authority v. Suydam Investors, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API