Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Sartain

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1962No. 4208Published

1Dissent

WIRTZ, J., WITH WHOM CASSIDY, J., JOINS, DISSENTING:

In my opinion, a realistic appraisal of the evidence in the record discloses that the injuries sustained by plaintiff resulted in, at most, a “black eye,” albeit a severe one. I am of the conviction that the award of the jury of $5,000 as general damages for such injury was clearly excessive under the rule applicable in this jurisdiction as set forth in Vasconcellos v. Juarez, 37 Haw. 364, 366. Cf., Crawford v. American Stores Co., 5 N.J. Misc. 413, 136 Atl. 715; Dyer v. Warwick, 19 La. App. 354, 140 So. 254; Lexington & E. Ry. v. Robinson,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vasconcellos v. JuarezHawaii Supreme Court · 1946
  2. SUN-RISE RICE FARMS v. HawkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Lindeman v. RaynorHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Pagliro v. Cleveland Same v. ReckmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  5. Crawford v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API