Legal Opinion

State v. Ashbrook

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this case, we must decide whether a passenger’s furtive movements in an automobile stopped for a possible traffic violation, justify an officer’s protective sweep for weapons around the passenger’s seat. Because the officer observed the passenger repeatedly reach under and around her seat during a traffic stop, we conclude the search was lawful. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppi’ess illegal drugs found in the vehicle.

Facts

[¶ 2.] On August 3, 1997, Karen Ashbrook was driving her van on 1-90 with two passengers en route to Sturgis, South…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. LeyvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. ChavezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. VentoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API