Fineman v. Cutler
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 177, Jan. T., 1922, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., March T., 1920, No. 6558, for plaintiff on bill in equity, in case of Max Fineman, Assignee of Jacob Gable, agent for David Feld, v. Samuel Cutler et ux. Bill for specific performance. Before Martin, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Decree for plaintiff. Defendants appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was decree, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,
In its main aspects, the present case is controlled by our decision in Dobkin v. Landsberg, the opinion in which is filed simultaneously herewith [the preceding case]. Max Fineman, plaintiff, sued in equity, as “assignee of Jacob Gable, agent for David Feld,” to enforce specific performance, against Samuel Cutler and Mollie Cutler, defendants, of a written contract for the sale of real estate, wherein the Cutlers agreed to sell, and “Jacob Gable, agent,” agreed to purchase, the property in controversy, for $5,000, payable by, inter alia, allowing “the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hartley v. LangkampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Maguire v. HeratySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Heck v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Powell v. ShepardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Yentzer v. Taylor Wine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- DeLuca v. Buckeye Coal CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.