Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Jeffrey S. Rasmussen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 30, 2012No. 11–1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Chief Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board brought a complaint against Jeffrey Rasmussen alleging numerous violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct after he removed a computer server containing software from a business in which his clients had a security interest. A division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa found Rasmussen violated the rules and recommended we order Rasmussen to cease and desist the practice of law in Iowa for sixty days. On our de novo review, we are unable to conclude that Rasmussen committed any violations of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James C. Van GinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Tim O'Neill Chevrolet, Inc. v. ForristallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Rolland Eugene KnopfSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mason James OuderkirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. R. Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. R. Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API