Pacific Railways Advertising Co. v. Carr
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. Frank Q-. Finlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover upon a promissory note made by defendant to plaintiff. The case was tried before a jury, which brought in a verdict for defendant. .Judgment followed in accordance therewith.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of court denying its motion for a new trial. While admitting the making of the note and nonpayment thereof, defendant insists there was no consideration for its execution. The note was given in renewal of one theretofore executed by defendant to plaintiff under the following circumstances: Under a purported contract made by plaintiff with a corporation known as the Amritam…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alabama National Bank v. HalseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Comings v. LeedySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Sullivan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Black v. Harrison Home Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Fontana v. Pacific Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ludwick v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- City Street Improvement Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Baker v. Citizens' State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.