Legal Opinion

Ken-Whitmore, Inc. v. Donen Stores, Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided May 2, 1949No. 645Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.,

Upon petition of defendant a rule was granted on plaintiff to show cause why the instant action, which is in assumpsit, should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. After answer filed and depositions taken the matter was argued before the court en banc and is now for disposition. The controlling facts do not appear to be in dispute..

The action is to recover the sum of $2,042, with interest, for women’s coats sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant between July 11, 1947, and August 26, 1947. Service of the complaint was accepted by defendant’s attorney on December 20, 1947.

B…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API