Legal Opinion

Peters v. Peters

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1981No. 6874; CIVIL NO. 50391PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

We are asked to review a choice-of-law decision of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit in a negligence action arising from an automobile accident that occurred on the island of Maui while Plaintiff-appellant Lilien G. Peters and her husband, Defendant-appellee Hans A. Peters, both residents of New York, were vacationing in Hawaii. As we do not deem a judicial abrogation of our interspousal tort immunity rule appropriate, and the record discloses adequate grounds for an application of Hawaii’s immunity rule rather than the law of the parties’ domicile…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Jenkins v. Whittaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API