Legal Opinion
Estapa v. Saldana
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 12, 1948No. 11887PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
On February 4, 1944, Bernardo Saldana and wife, Cleotilde G. de Saldana, and Joe Estapa entered into a contract for the leasing of Lots Nos. 13 and 14 in Block No. 237, in the City of Edinburg, Hidalgo County, Texas, for a period of two years, ending February 28, 1946, at an agreed rental of $1500.00 for the two-year period, which $1500.00 was also, the consideration for an option to Joe Estapa to purchase said property. Within due time Estapa exercised his option and offered to .pay the sum of $8,500.00, the agreed consideration stated in the contract, but it developed that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. SnowballTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Berry Bros. v. Fairbanks, Morse Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- George M. Dilley & Son v. RatcliffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Estapa v. SaldanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Keesee v. CateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ajaz R. Siddiqui, Najeeb Siddiqui and Suncoat Environmental and Construction, Inc. v. Fancy Bites, L.L.C., Quick Eats L.L.C., Farhan S. Qureshi and Syed Khalid AliCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Esparza v. EsparzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Butler, Williams & Jones v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Owsley v. MixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964