Legal Opinion
City of Kent v. Lamb
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 31, 1969No. 134-41200-1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Horowitz, A. C. J.
The City of Kent (Kent) brought condemnation proceedings to acquire a portion of respondents’ residence property for the widening and improvement of James Street. The trial court, after a hearing in which the respondents were represented by counsel, entered the required order adjudicating public use and necessity. Re spondents then obtained a writ of certiorari to review the order so entered. Respondents appear pro se.
Kent is a city of the third class. (RCW 35.24.) The condemnation proceeding was brought pursuant to RCW 8.12-.030 reading as follows:
Every city and town and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Tacoma v. WelckerWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Mercer Island v. KaltenbachWashington Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Singer v. HaraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Publishers Forest Products Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Cramer v. Van ParysCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Nestegard v. Investment Exchange Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- City of Bellingham v. Eiford Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.