Legal Opinion

Stueber v. Arrowhead Farm Estates Ltd. Partnership

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1987No. 590, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Chief Judge.

Although expressed differently by the appellants, the question posed to us is, where a contract for the sale of property provides an exclusive remedy upon breach, may a court, having found a default, nevertheless ignore that remedy and enter judgment for the errant party? We conclude that under the circumstances of this case the court is not permitted to rewrite the contract and thereby substitute its will for that of the contracting parties. Because the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County did precisely that, we reverse its judgment and remand the matter to that court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. M & R Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Hankins v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. Brownstein v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  4. Mortgage Investors v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ReichertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Gilbane Building Co. v. Brisk Waterproofing Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Department of Housing & Community Development v. MullenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Planmatics, Inc. v. ShowersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API