State v. Rudd
Hamilton County Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtMark P. Painter, J.
The facts of this case are not in dispute, and have been stipulated by the parties.
In January 1987, defendant, Fonda Rudd, purchased some furniture from Economy Furniture Company of Cincinnati (“Economy Furniture”). A time-payment account was opened, with an original balance of $976.22. Subsequently, defendant made payments against the account up to May 1988 when she issued a check to Economy Furniture drawn on her account at the Central Trust Company in the sum of $50. At that time the balance due on the account was $408.50. The check was returned “insufficient funds,” and evidently remains…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. LowensteinOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. StoutWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. CreachbaumOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. NewsomCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- State v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GlennHamilton County Municipal Court · 1990
- State v. HowellHamilton County Municipal Court · 1994
- State v. CruzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HedrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. TaylorClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2005