Legal Opinion

People v. Rodolitz

Nassau County District Court

Decided July 28, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard Tomson, J.

This is a motion to suppress evidence discovered upon an unauthorized search following an arrest which the defendant urges was unlawful. At the hearing the People relied to some extent on “ police reports,” the reliability of which was not attacked. There is thus presented another nuance in the application of the rule last set forth in People v. Malinsky (15 N Y 2d 86, 91). There it was stated: “ A search, not authorized by consent or a search warrant, is deemed reasonable only if conducted as ‘ incident to a lawful arrest ’ (People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368, 373; see, also, Beck v. Ohio, 379…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BoydNassau County District Court · 1968
  2. People v. RodolitzNassau County District Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API