Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Ricci v. Russell Construction Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 30, 1965No. Civ. No. 9807PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ZAMPANO, District Judge.

In the main action, the use-plaintiff Ricci, as a subcontractor and material-man, is suing the general contractor, Russell Construction Co., Inc., and Russell’s surety, the Columbia Casualty Company, for materials and services rendered in the amount of $15,000.00. Jurisdiction is conferred by 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq., commonly designated as the Miller Act.

On or about June 27, 1958, the defendant Russell entered into a contract with the United States for the construction of sewerage facilities at certain Nike sites within the State of Connecticut. Russell, in turn,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dery v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Railey v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunham v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API