Legal Opinion
Railey v. Southern Railway Co.
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided January 1, 1963No. AC/928PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWyche, District Judge
(sitting by designation).
The above case is before me upon the motion of the plaintiff H. C. Railey to dismiss the Third Party Defendant, Pearce-Young-Angel Company, Inc. from the above cause of action upon the following grounds: “1. That plaintiff is an employee of Southern Railway Company and not Pearce-Young-Angel Company, Inc. 2. That Pearce-Young-Angel Company, Inc. is under no duty to furnish the plaintiff with a reasonably safe place to work. 3. The plaintiff is not bound by any contract between the Southern Railway and Pearce-Young-Angel Company, Inc. 4. To introduce said contract in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Mutual Ins. Co. Of the District of Columbia v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Falls Industries, Inc. v. Consolidated Chemical Industries, Inc., and D. C. Hall Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- John F. Kennedy v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. United States Steel Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- McPherson v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Duke v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ralph E. Cazad v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- McCann v. Falgout Boat Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Southern Railway Company v. Ernest I. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- National Fire Insurance v. Daniel J. Keating Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.