Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Newman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1991No. 9012SC376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the statement by plaintiffs’ attorney in open court regarding the taking of a voluntary dismissal is ambiguous as to whether plaintiff is in fact taking a voluntary dismissal or is expressing an intention to do so.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 41(a)(1) (1990) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides in relevant part:

[A]n action or any claim therein may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Danielson v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. GENERAL MILLS RESTAURANTS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Cullen v. Carolina Healthcare SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API