Legal Opinion

Peoples Cab Co., a Corporation Qualified as a Public Utility Under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. George I. Bloom

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 20, 1972No. 71-1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is a suit for damages under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, brought by a certificated taxicab company and its sole stockholders against the Chairman of the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission. After the plaintiffs had amended their original complaint, the district court, 330 F.Supp. 1235, granted a motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs have appealed.

We agree with the district court that so much of the complaint as alleges in substance that the defendant has slandered the plaintiffs and their business does not assert the violation of any right protected by the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peoples Cab Co. v. BloomDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. PAAC v. RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Fram v. Yellow Cab Company of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Mimms v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Dixon v. Pennsylvania Crime CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Church of Scientology of California v. CazaresDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API