Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Latham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. William H. Stewaet.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Appellee, Latham, brought this suit against the appellants, Bennett and Burnett, to recover upon their warranties of title part of the purchase money paid by him to Bennett for a tract of land bought-by him from Bennett, and by Bennett from Burnett, as containing 640 acres, but which contained only 492 acres. The land was described in the petition as being section No. 5, patented to Burnett as assignee of Beaty, Seale & Farwood, and its metes and bounds as given in the deed from Bennett to Latham were set out. It was alleged that Burnett sold and conveyed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Booth v. UpshurTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Gerald v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Daughtrey v. KnolleTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Bellamy v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. BoudreauxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Bonzer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Briley v. HayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Broussard v. L. Cartwright Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Maxcy v. NorsworthyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API