Aetna Finance Co. v. Gaither
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
Aetna Finance Company, doing business as ITT Financial Services, appeals from a judgment awarding $26,067.38 in damages and $13,258.77 in costs and attorney’s fees to Frank A. and Velma Murray. A jury found that ITT had violated the Unfair Practices Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 57-12-1 to -21 (Repl.Pamp.1987), by knowingly making a statement that was false or misleading to Robert and Neecie Gaither, and that this deception caused the Murrays to lose their interest in a second mortgage they had subordinated to the mortgage ITT held on property the Gaithers were purchasing from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Bandag of Springfield, Inc. v. Bandag, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fleet Mortgage Corp. v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Slide-A-Ride of Las Cruces, Inc. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Guest v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009