Legal Opinion

Aetna Finance Co. v. Gaither

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1994No. 20927, 20994 and 21059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Justice.

Aetna Finance Company, doing business as ITT Financial Services, appeals from a judgment awarding $26,067.38 in damages and $13,258.77 in costs and attorney’s fees to Frank A. and Velma Murray. A jury found that ITT had violated the Unfair Practices Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 57-12-1 to -21 (Repl.Pamp.1987), by knowingly making a statement that was false or misleading to Robert and Neecie Gaither, and that this deception caused the Murrays to lose their interest in a second mortgage they had subordinated to the mortgage ITT held on property the Gaithers were purchasing from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bandag of Springfield, Inc. v. Bandag, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Fleet Mortgage Corp. v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Slide-A-Ride of Las Cruces, Inc. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Guest v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API