Legal Opinion

Petrarca v. Halligan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1974No. 42889PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Joan D. Yazzolino, the personal representative of the estate of Mason C. Halligan, appeals from an order of the trial court granting a motion to substitute her, in place of the decedent, Mason Halligan, as a party defendant in a lawsuit by respondents, Anthony and Dominic Petrarca and their wives, as plaintiffs. '

The sole issue is whether the court has jurisdiction to enter an order substituting the personal representative of the deceased when the motion to substitute is not made within 90 days after the first publication of notice to creditors. We hold that it may under CR 25(a) (1) and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis Lumber Co. v. SortorWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Mohney v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Emwright v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Nearing v. Golden State Foods Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Jones v. StebbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. GoinsWashington Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API