Legal Opinion

Reid v. Boohar

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 2004PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Michael Scott Boohar, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in refusing to open the default judgment entered by Appellee, Donnie Reid. We hold that Appellant, a layperson, established a legitimate excuse for not filing a timely response to Appellee’s complaint where he entrusted his claim to his insurance carrier and reasonably relied on its representation, and the insurer mistakenly failed to file a timely answer. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand to the trial court to open the default judgment and allow Appellant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shainline v. Alberti Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Flynn v. Casa Di Bertacchi Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Rounsley v. D.C. Ventre & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Penneys v. Richard Kastner Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Myers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Aquilino v. Philadelphia Catholic ArchdioceseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Boatin v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Myers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Boatin v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API