Legal Opinion
Hitzig v. Borough-Tel Service, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.), entered May 11, 1984, denying plaintiff’s motion for an order, among other things, for an immediate trial of the subject action and a disqualification of the law firm representing defendants, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to direct that the law firm representing defendants be disqualified from further representing them in this action and, except as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
*678Plaintiff and defendants Barsel and Steinberg were the sole owners of Borough-Tel Service, Inc. Borough-Tel operated a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hempstead Bank v. Reliance Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paretti v. Cavalier Label Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Chang v. ChangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Northern Trust Bank of Florida/Sarasota v. ColemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Hoganwillig, PLLC v. Swormville Fire Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Caravousanos v. Kings County HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 2010