Legal Opinion

Lenzi v. Colberg

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 8, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSenter, J.

The original bill was filed in this cause by complainant against the owners of certain lots sitiiated in the Chickasaw Gardens Subdivision in the City of Memphis. The bill alleges in substance that complainant is the owner of a certain lot or parcel of real estate, situated on the west side of Outlet Avenue in the city of Memphis, which avenue is immediately west of and adjoining the Chickasaw Gardens Subdivision; that at the time said Chickasaw Gardens Subdivision was laid out as a proposed subdivision outside of but near the city limits of the city of Memphis, that it became necessary for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nunnelly v. Southern Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Long v. MayberryTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Childers v. Wm. H. Coleman Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Mahalovitch v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Land Developers, Inc. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Marron v. ScarbroughCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  3. B & B Enterprises of Wilson Co., LLC v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API