Legal Opinion

Kleven v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-I.D.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided February 14, 2002No. 06-01-00078-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice CORNELIUS.

Richard Allen Eleven, II appeals from an adverse summary judgment granted in his suit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division (TDCJ). Eleven, an inmate acting pro se, sued the TDCJ and two of its employees, Matthew Cheatham and Gary Stevens, in their individual and official capacities. In his initial petition, Eleven contended the TDCJ was depriving him of his right to compensation under Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 501.007 (Vernon 1998) 1 and under the United States and Texas Constitutions without due process of law. 2 He…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United Blood Services v. LongoriaTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Gar-Dal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cammack the Cook, L.L.C. v. Eastburn, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  2. In Re Kleven, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  3. Perry v. Stanley, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. Mitchell v. Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Heirs of Del Real v. EasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API