Legal Opinion
Ori, Inc. v. Lanewala
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 7, 2001No. 99-2402-JWLPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District judge.
In this diversity action, ORI, Inc. (“ORI”), a Delaware corporation with its principal office in Overland Park, Kansas, brings suit against Mr. Yusuf Lanewala, a resident of India and the former Chief Executive Officer of ORI’s Indian subsidiary, Mafatlal Consultancy Services, Inc. (“MCS”), challenging Mr. Lanewala’s actions following his resignation from employment with MCS. ORI alleges that af: ter leaving MCS, Mr. Lanewala hired or attempted to hire ORI employees, thereby making Mr. Lanewala liable for (1) breaching a protective covenant…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alpine Atlantic Asset Management AG v. ComstockDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Foxfield Villa Associates, LLC v. RegnierDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- WADDEKK & REED FINANCIAL, INC. v. Torchmark Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- American Maplan Corp. v. HeilmayrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.