Legal Opinion

Eristma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 9, 2000No. 2D00-758PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

766 So.2d 1095 (2000)

Dieu-Vieu ERISTMA, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D00-758.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 9, 2000.

2Per curiam

Appellant Dieu-Vieu Eristma challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Eristma raised four possible grounds for relief. We affirm the trial court's order as to three of the grounds, but reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the remaining ground.

On August 2, 1996, the State charged Eristma with six counts…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cottle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rudolf v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Odegaard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Beasley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Feldpausch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Aebi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API