Cottle v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
733 So.2d 963 (1999)
James L. COTTLE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 91,822.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 8, 1999.
James T. Miller, Jacksonville, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review Cottle v. State, 700 So.2d 53 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), based on direct and express conflict with the decisions[1] in Seymore v. State, 693 So.2d 647 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Hilligenn v. State, 660 So.2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); and Abella v. State, 429 So.2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). At issue is…
Also in this document: Dissent · Wells; Dissent · Overton.
3Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. William Day, A/K/A William McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re AlvernazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by110 opinions
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Alcorn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Commonwealth v. MaharMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.