Legal Opinion

State v. Crow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 2018No. A162527PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

*89This criminal case requires us to determine whether 11 miniature horses, multiple cats, and a dog are separate victims for purposes of merger. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for 13 counts of unlawful possession of an animal by a person previously convicted of second-degree animal neglect. ORS 167.332(1)(a).1 On appeal, defendant raises seven assignments of error. We reject defendant's first assignment of error without further written discussion. In a combined argument pursuant to ORAP 5.45(6), defendant contends in her second through seventh assignments of error that the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. NewcombOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. Fessenden / DickeOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State/Klamath County v. HersheyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API