Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Reuter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1967PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The attorney general seeks a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to honor the $54.84 voucher. We deem the prayer for a declaratory judgment on the questions raised of constitutionality to be determinative of all issues to be considered by the court. Such issues are as follows:

1. Does sec. 144.21, Stats., delegate legislative powers to the department in violation of sec. 1, art. IV, Const. ?

2. Does sec. 144.21, Stats., authorize the payment of state money for purposes that are not of statewide concern in violation of sec. 2, art. VIII, Const.?

3. Does sec. 144.21, Stats.,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Wisconsin Development Authority v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Rippe v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Warren v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. J.F. Ahern Co. v. Wisconsin State Building CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API