Legal Opinion
Cusano v. Kotler
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 19, 1946No. Civ. A. No. 3131PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
The present action, instituted by the plaintiff under the patent laws, charges infringement of United States patent No. 2,312,882 issued to and still owned by the plaintiff. The defendant challenges the validity of the patent, but admits infringement if the patent is found valid.
The patent involved herein is on a game board of the shuffleboard type, but so designed that the game can be played with a board of approximately one half the length of the usual shuffleboard.
Plaintiff’s game board comprises a table having a substantially flat playing surface enclosed by four…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- National Cash Register Co. v. American Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1892
- Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Walcott MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Belsinger, Inc. v. American Viscose Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956