Legal Opinion

McCallum v. Gornto

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 27, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

Defendant in error, Gornto, as Receiver of Citizens Bank of Mayo, recovered a judgment for money damages against plaintiff in error MeCallum on November 25, 1924. Smith, as Liquidator, later succeeded to the administration of the affairs of the defunct bank. He assigned the judgment to one Elliott and Homer T. and Z. H. Putnal. Afterward Elliott assigned his interest in the judgment to Homer T. Putnal. Thereafter, the Putnals filed a petition in scire facias to revive the judgment, doing so in the name of the orignial plaintiff Gornto. Writ of scire facias issued, was served and returned and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owens v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Bank of Eau Claire v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Massey v. Pineapple Orange Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Brown v. HarleySupreme Court of Florida · 1848
  5. Sammis v. Wightman ex rel. MarcherSupreme Court of Florida · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. B. A. Lott, Inc. v. PadgettSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc. v. Woolwine Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  5. DeKALB SWINE BREEDERS v. WOOLWINE SUPPLYSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API