Legal Opinion

Lonsdale v. Reinhard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1918No. 9240PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by Julia Reinhard against Eugene F. Lonsdale and another. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict, motion for new trial overruled, and defendants bring .error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

This action was begun in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., by Julia Reinhard, defendant in error, plaintiff in the lower court, against Eugene F. Lonsdale and Lizzie Lonsdale, plaintiffs in error, defendants in the lower court, to recover possession of lots 3 and 4 in block 8 of Ilodge addition to the city of Tulsa. Okla.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court; that is, defendant in error as lfiaintiff. and plaintiffs in error as defendants.

On the 24th day of February, 1912, the plaintiff and defendant Eugene F. Lonsdale entered into a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnett v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Seabury v. Doe ex dem. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Knox v. SprattSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
  5. Talley v. Kingfisher Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stone v. RitzingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Eldridge v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Hill v. BufordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Sparks v. TrosperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Woodard v. SpeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API