Legal Opinion
Hall v. Bell Finance Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 24, 1935No. 23835PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
1. The petition was brought in the name of “Bell Finance Company.” It was insisted by demurrer that no substantial party plaintiff was stated in the petition, because it was not alleged that the Bell Finance Company was either a corporation or a partnership, or an adopted trade name. In an amendment to the petition it was set out that the plaintiff was a corporation. The court allowed the amendment and overruled the demurrer. Held, that the court did not err in allowing the .amendment and in overruling the demurrer. Bremen Foundry & Machine Co. v. Boswell, 22 Ga. App. 434, 436 (96 S. E. 182);…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eslinger v. HerndonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Haynes v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Saint Cecilia's Academy v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Bremen Foundry & Machine Works v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Bell Finance Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dickson-Carroll Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938