Legal Opinion

Gorman v. McArdle

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Albany county. Action by Daniel J. Gorman against Patrick J. McArdle to recover damages, alleged to have been sustained through failure of defendant to furnish a fire escape as required by statute. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.

This action was brought on account of injuries received by plaintiff on September 8,1889, in jumping from a fourth-story window of defendant’s .manufacturing establishment, where he wras employed, during a fire which consumed the building, defendant having negligently omitted to provide a proper fire escape. In fact, there was' no fire escape as prescribed by statute; but a window in' the room where plaintiff was employed opened onto the flat roof of defendant’s adjoining building, and from this roof, through a scuttle, there was, as defendant claimed, a proper and safe access to the street…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Pantzar v. . Tilly Foster Iron Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Gibson v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Willy v. . MulledyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Benzing v. . Steinway and SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merlo v. Johnston City & Big Muddy Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Burt v. NicholsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. Arnold v. . National Starch Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Miller v. Union Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Sembler v. CowperthwaitNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API