Legal Opinion
E. M. Miller Co. v. Meriden Bronze Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
Decided April 22, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
This bill in equity alleges infringement of the first claim of patent No. 477,865, granted June 28, 1892, to William 0. Homan, and duly assigned to the complainant. Said claim is as follows:
“(1) In a wick adjuster for central-draft lamps, the combination, with a wick-band, of a drawbar attached thereto; a stem connected at its upper end with the upper end of the said bar, and provided at its lower end with coarse screw threads; a tube having a centrally perforated knurled operating nut located at its upper end, and constructed with internal screw threads corresponding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. CarySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dashiell v. GrosvenorSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Devlin v. PaynterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
- Briggs v. Central Ice Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Timolat v. Philadelphia Pneumatic Tool Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
- E. L. Watrous Mfg. Co. v. American Hardware Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1908
- Lettelier v. MannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
- National Dump Car Co. v. Ralston Steel Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909