Legal Opinion

Felix v. Walker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1899No. 10893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, G. J. :

This was an action by Oscar Felix, the plaintiff in error, against the receivers of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company for damages on account of the loss of services of his minor son, Effer Felix, caused by injuries negligently inflicted upon the minor by running upon and over him with & train of •■cars. Previous to the commencement of the abtion, Oscar Felix, as guardian and next-friend of his son Effer, made with the receivers an agreement of settlement and compromise in behalf of the minor for the injuries received by him,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglass v. MattingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. J. B. Dinsmore & Co. v. StimbertNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  3. De Lissa v. Fuller Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  4. Scandinavian Coal & Mining Co. v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Conwill v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Caldwell v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Tepfer v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Meeh v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API