Legal Opinion
Tenuto v. Lederle Laboratories
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*368OPINION OF THE COURT
William F. Mastro, J.
Motion (No. 847) of defendant Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Company (Lederle) and the cross motion (No. 2631) of the plaintiff for summary judgment are both denied.
Plaintiffs complaint1 alleges that he “contracted paralytic poliomyelitis as a result of having contact with live polio virus which had been excreted by his infant daughter Diana as a result of having taken * * * Orimune” (fl 6). Orimune is described in the complaint as “a live oral trivalent (polio virus vaccine) * * * which contains Savin [should read Sabin] Strains…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Amatulli v. Delhi Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Martin v. HackerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- DiBartolo v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011