Legal Opinion

Meegan v. Village of Tinley Park

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1972No. 44568PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court of Cook County, dismissing a mandamus action which the plaintiffs had brought against the defendants for the issuance of a building permit to erect a gasoline station on certain property pursuant to an annexation agreement.

On September 8, 1959, a developer, Katschke, entered into an agreement with the Village of Tinley Park for the annexation, in a series of four steps or units, of 80 acres which he was purchasing from another party. The agreement provided, among other things, that the developer was to complete the improvements within each…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. First Nat. Bank of Lake Forest v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ehrlich v. Village of WilmetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Mega v. Holy Cross HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Moore v. Jackson Park HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Village of Chatham v. County of SangamonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hupp v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API