Legal Opinion

Bowden v. The Sir Garnet Wolseley

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 28, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Admiralty. Action to recover damages íor personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by the libelant by reason of his falling through a hatch of the steam-ship Sir Garnet Wolseley. The libelant was a night-watchman on the steamer. At about 9 o’clock in the evening he undertook to sit down upon a bunker hatch upon the main deck, assuming the hatch cover to be on, and without looking to see whether the cover was on or not. The cover was not on; and the man, on sitting down, of course fell backward into the hold. The evidence shows that this hatch was sometimes without cover, and sometimes covered, as the necessity of the ship…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Craig v. The SaratogaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1898
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Ruhe v. LineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
  5. Jones v. Clinchfield Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API