Legal Opinion · Dissent

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 23, 1993No. 91-5223, 91-5310Published

1DissentStephen F. Williams, Circuit Judge

Although the substantive issue presented by this case seems relatively unimportant, the court’s decision dramatically broadens the scope of judicial review of National Mediation Board decisions. Despite extensive recitation of and homage to precedent establishing a highly deferential standard, Maj. Op. at 136-37, the court in practice uses an approach no more deferential (and perhaps even less so) than ordinary review under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). I dissent.

Judicial review under § 2 Ninth of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 152…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Adams Fruit Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API