Legal Opinion

Stoner v. Hannan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1942No. 8,245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

R. E. Stoner filed an action in the district court of Yellowstone county to secure the dissolution of the partnership in which the defendant S. C. Hannan was his partner. Shortly after filing his complaint, plaintiff moved the court for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite. The motion was based on the complaint. To the motion defendant interposed objection supported by his affidavit. After hearing, the court appointed a receiver of the partnership business. This appeal is from that order.

Before discussing the facts it may be well to set out the statute under which the court is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Montana Ranches Co. v. DolanMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Wright v. FlynnMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Brown v. Erb-Harper-Rigney Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Buchhalter v. MyersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. Masterson v. HubbertMontana Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Little v. LittleMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Crowley v. Valley West Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Little v. LittleMontana Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API