Legal Opinion

Buford v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1927No. 25764PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Criminal Law, 16CJ, p. 1105, n. 11; 17CJ, p. 371, n. 49, 51. Indictment and Information, 31CJ, p. 758, n. 87; p. 777, n. 83. Intoxicating Liquors, 33CJ, p. 517, n. 60, 62; p. 576, n. 63. Juries, 35CJ, p. 229, n. 76. Statute, 36Cyc, p. 1060, n. 76; p. 1076, n. 39. As to whether indictment or information for unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor must state name of person to whom sale is made, see annotation in 23 L.R.A. 581; 5 A.L.R. 409; 15 R.C.L. 387; 3 R.C.L. Supp. 453; 5 R.C.L. Supp. 837. This is an appeal from a conviction for selling intoxicating liquor. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. ArtistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Teat v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Hemingway v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Sarah v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hart v. BackstromMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Tuck v. BlackmonMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lawrence v. Mississippi State Tax CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Holmes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Goode v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API