Hart v. Backstrom
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtANdersoN, J.
Appellee filed his bill in the chancery court of George county against appellant and all others having or claiming any interest in lots three and four of block one of St. George terrace, in the town of Lucedale, in the said county, to confirm his title thereto. There was a decree pro oonfesso against all other defendants, except appellant, Hart. Afterwards there was a hearing on original hill, and answer of appellant, Hart, and proofs, resulting in a decree in appellee’s favor, confirming the latter’s title to the lots involved. From that decree appellant prosecutes this appeal.
It was alleged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Fox v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pro-Choice Mississippi v. FordiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Belmont v. Miss. State Tax Comm'nMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Lamar Cty. Sch. Bd. of Lamar Cty. v. SaulMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Jackson v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- McCaskill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.