Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 21, 1994No. Docket No. 20931-92UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNIE S. LAWSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Lawson v. Commissioner

Docket No. 20931-92

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1994-286; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 289; 67 T.C.M. (CCH) 3121;

June 21, 1994, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Bennie S. Lawson, pro se.

For respondent: Josh Ungerman.

DAWSON

DAWSON

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

DAWSON, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in the joint Federal income taxes of Bennie S. Lawson (hereinafter petitioner) and her husband Alvin C. Lawson (hereinafter Lawson) of $ 6,761 and $ 8,721, for 1987 and…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Bixby v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  4. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Carlos and Jacqueline Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph, Jr. And Anastasia Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CC & F Western Operations Ltd. Partnership v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. In Re Grace Lilly, Debtor. Grace Lilly v. Internal Revenue Service, in Re Grace Lilly, Debtor. Grace Lilly v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. Salman Ranch Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Salman Ranch Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Salman Ranch Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API