Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salman Ranch Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 30, 2009No. 2008-5053Published

1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent, for the Court of Federal Claims was correct in affirming the action of the Internal Revenue Service in applying the extended six-year period of limitations of 26 U.S.C. (“I.R.C.”) § 6501(e)(1)(A) to the assessment of income tax on the sale of the Salman Ranch.1 The IRS explained that the standard three-year limitations period did not apply because the taxpayer omitted from gross income “an amount properly includible therein which is in excess of 25 percent of the amount of gross income stated in the return.” 26 U.S.C. § 6501(e)(1)(A). The parties stipulated, for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Colony, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Kligfeld Holdings v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007
  5. Kornman & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API