Legal Opinion

Orvedal v. Orvedal

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2003No. 20030043PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jeffrey Orvedal appealed from an amended divorce judgment clarifying the visitation provisions in the original decree and modifying Jeffrey’s support obligation. We hold the court did not err in clarifying the visitation provisions and the visitation schedule specified by the court is not clearly erroneous. We further conclude the court’s calculation of Jeffrey’s child support obligation is in accordance with the child support guidelines and is not clearly erroneous. We affirm and remand for the trial court to consider Laurie Orve-dal’s request for attorney fees on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reinecke v. GriffethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Greenwood v. GreenwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Minar v. MinarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Goff v. GoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Myers v. MyersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brandner v. BrandnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Verhey v. McKenzieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Bala v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API