Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1990No. 17136Published

1Opinion of the Court

786 P.2d 1127 (1990)

117 Idaho 225

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Henry William SMITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17136.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

January 31, 1990.

John C. Arkoosh, Gooding, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Michael A. Henderson (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a criminal case in which a father was convicted of lewd conduct with his ten-year-old daughter. There are three issues presented on this appeal:

1. Should the trial court have instructed the jury that they were not required to reach a verdict, but…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. RandlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. BootheIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API