Legal Opinion

Davis v. Collins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 29, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Before DanTzwr, J., Spartanburg, June, 1903. Action by Mabel H. Davis against J. D. Collins. From Circuit judgment, defendant appeals. cite: Non-expert witness may give an opinion after stating facts: 19 S. C., 531; 1 McM., 56; 19 S. C., 66; 117 Mass., 133; 49 N. H., 399; 56 N. FL, 337. What must be shown to warrant vindictive damages: 35 S. C., 489; 60 L. R. A., 406; 76 Minn., 379; Addison on Torts, 7 ed., 164; Cool, on Torts, 694; 5 C. & P., 373; 59 Ind., 130; 101 Mich.,…

Read the full summary

Before DanTzwr, J., Spartanburg, June, 1903. Action by Mabel H. Davis against J. D. Collins. From Circuit judgment, defendant appeals. cite: Non-expert witness may give an opinion after stating facts: 19 S. C., 531; 1 McM., 56; 19 S. C., 66; 117 Mass., 133; 49 N. H., 399; 56 N. FL, 337. What must be shown to warrant vindictive damages: 35 S. C., 489; 60 L. R. A., 406; 76 Minn., 379; Addison on Torts, 7 ed., 164; Cool, on Torts, 694; 5 C. & P., 373; 59 Ind., 130; 101 Mich., 373; Hob., 134; 3 Wend., 391; 15 Da. Ann., 133; 1 Smith Dead. Ca., 549. Previous'provocations are admissible in…

1Opinion of the Court

The first opinion was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action for damages arising out of an assault and battery upon the plaintiff by the defendant.

The alleged wrong is thus set forth in paragraph 2 of the complaint: “That on Sunday, the second day of March, 1902, in the city of Spartanburg, at the depot of the Southern Railway Company in said city, while the plaintiff was quietly and peaceably standing at or near said depot, the defendant being there for an unlawful purpose, to wit: for the purpose of committing an assault and battery of at least a high and aggravated nature upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Avery v. RayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1804
  2. Fairbanks v. WitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Stetlar v. NellisNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sinram v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Rakestraw v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Fordyce v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Morrow v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API